TP/C&S Total Produce (Corn and Straw.) C Corn.
TP Total Produce.
OCD Offal Corn to 100 Dressed.
C100 Corn to 100 Straw.
-----------------------------------+-----------------+-----+-----+----
Increase per
Produce per Acre, &c.
Acre By Manure.
P --------------+----+----+-----+----+-----+-----+-----+
l Dressed Corn.
o --------+-----+
TP
t Qty.
Wt/Bu
OC
TC
S&C
C&S
C
S&C
TP
OCD
C100
s --------+-----+----+----+-----+----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- Bu. Pks.
lbs.
lbs.
lbs.
lbs.
lbs.
lbs.
lbs.
lbs.
30 2
61.1
156
2031
3277
5308
908
1375
2283
8.2
61.9
0 32 1
61.2
147
2119
3735
5854
996
1833
2829
7.2
56.7
1 29 3
62.3
117
1981
3628
5609
858
1726
2584
6.2
54.6
2 16 3
61.0
95
1123
1902
3025
..
..
..
8.9
59.0
3
27 1
61.9
82
1780
2948
4728
657
1046
1703
4.7
60.3
4
29 0
61.8
130
1921
3412
5333
798
1510
2309
7.1
56.3
5a 32 2
61.4
136
2132
3721
5853
1009
1819
2827
6.6
57.2
5b 24 3
62.1
122
1663
2786
4449
540
884
1124
7.8
59.6
6a 24 1
61.6
127
1632
2803
4435
509
901
1410
8.2
58.2
6b 27 3
61.7
118
1834
3151
4985
711
1249
1960
6.8
58.2
7a 25 1
61.5
125
1682
2953
4635
559
1051
1610
7.9
56.9
7b
32 1
62.1
102
2115
3683
5798
992
1781
2773
5.5
57.4
8a 30 3
61.7
123
2020
3720
5740
897
1818
2715
6.5
54.3
8b 22 3
62.5
..
1477
2506
3983
228
604
..
..
53.9
1}9a 26 2
61.0
..
1755
3052
4807
632
1150
..
..
57.5
2} 26 0
61.3
123
1717
2858
4575
594
956
1550
..
60.1
9b 25 3
61.5
118
1702
2891
4593
579
989
1568
7.3
58.8
10a 25 2
61.2
133
1705
2874
4579
582
972
1554
8.2
59.3
10b
30 3
61.6
142
2044
3517
5561
921
1615
2536
6.3
59.5
11a 29 1
61.8
123
1941
3203
5144
818
1301
2119
6.7
60.6
11b 29 2
62.0
124
1953
3452
5405
830
1550
2380
6.6
57.1
12a 27 0
61.8
121
1796
3124
4920
673
1222
1895
7.1
57.4
12b 20 2
62.5
108
1959
3306
5265
836
1404
2240
5.5
57.3
13a 27 1
62.3
96
1801
3171
4972
678
1269
1947
5.3
56.7
13b 28 0
62.8
175
1944
3362
5306
821
1460
2281
9.7
59.5
14a 26 3
62.8
166
1856
3006
4862
733
1104
1837
9.8
61.7
14b
32 3
63.0
151
2214
3876
6090
1091
1974
3065
7.2
57.1
15a 32 0
62.6
137
2140
3617
5757
1017
1715
2732
6.6
59.1
15b
29 1
62.3
132
1959
3417
5376
836
1515
2351
6.9
57.3
16a 34 2
62.6
119
2283
4012
6295
1160
2110
3270
5.2
56.9
16b 33 3
62.3
119
2222
4027
6249
1099
2125
3224
5.6
55.1
17a 35 1
62.0
117
2314
4261
6575
1191
2359
3550
6.4
54.3
17b 32 0
62.7
142
2160
3852
6012
1037
1950
2987
6.9
56.0
18a 29 1
62.9
181
2029
4164
6193
906
2262
3168
9.7
48.7
18b
32 3
62.8
140
2195
4202
6397
1072
2300
3372
6.7
52.2
19 20 0
62.5
70
1332
2074
3406
209
172
381
4.9
64.2
20 .. ..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
}21
}22 --------+-----+----+----+-----+----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+----
Here again, I want the Deacon to look at plot 0, where 500 lbs. Peruvian guano, sown in October, gives an _increase_ of nearly 14 bushels of dressed wheat and 1,375 lbs. of straw per acre. On plot 2, where 14 tons of barn-yard manure have now been applied four years in succession (56 tons in all), there is a little more straw, but not quite so much grain, as from the 500 lbs. of guano.
"But will the guano," said the Deacon, "be as lasting as the manure?"
"Not for wheat," said I. "But if you seed the wheat down with clover, as would be the case in this section, we should get considerable benefit, probably, from the guano. If wheat was sown after the wheat, the guano applied the previous season would do little good on the second crop of wheat. And yet it is a matter of fact that there would be a considerable proportion of the guano left in the soil. The wheat cannot take it up.
But the clover can. And we all know that if we can grow good crops of clover, plowing it under, or feeding it out on the land, or making it into hay and saving the manure obtained from it, we shall thus be enabled to raise good crops of wheat, barley, oats, potatoes, and corn, and in this sense guano is a 'lasting' manure."
"Barnyard-manure," said the Doctor, "is altogether too 'lasting.' Here we have had 56 tons of manure on an acre of land in four years, and yet an acre dressed with 500 lbs. of guano produces just as good a crop. The manure contains far more plant-food, of all kinds, than the guano, but it is so 'lasting' that it does not do half as much good as its composition would lead us to expect. Its 'lasting' properties are a decided objection, rather than an advantage. If we could make it less lasting--in other words, if we could make it act quicker, it would produce a greater effect, and possess a greater value. In proportion to its const.i.tuents, the barn-yard manure is far cheaper than the guano, but it has a less beneficial effect, because these const.i.tuents are not more completely decomposed and rendered available."
"That," said I, "opens up a very important question. We have more real value in manure than most of us are as yet able to bring out and turn to good account. The sandy-land farmer has an advantage over the clay-land farmer in this respect. The latter has a naturally richer soil, but it costs him more to work it, and manure does not act so rapidly. The clay-land farmer should use his best endeavors to decompose his manure."
"Yes," said the Doctor, "and, like John Johnston, he will probably find it to his advantage to use it largely as a top-dressing on the surface.
Exposing manure to the atmosphere, spread out on the land for several months, and harrowing it occasionally, will do much to render its const.i.tuents available. But let us return to Mr. Lawes' wonderful experiments."
"On eight plots," said I, "300 lbs. of ammonia-salts were used without any other manures, and the _average_ yield on these eight plots was nearly 26 bushels per acre, or an average increase of 9 bushels per acre. The same amount of ammonia-salts, with the addition of superphosphate of lime, gave an increase of 13 bushels per acre. 400 lbs. ammonia salts, with superphosphate of lime, gave an _increase_ of nearly 16 bushels per acre, or three bushels per acre more than where 14 tons of barn-yard manure had been used four years in succession.
"I hope, after this, the Deacon will forgive me for dwelling on the value of available nitrogen or ammonia as a manure for wheat."
"I see," said the Deacon, "that ground _rice_ was used this year for manure; and in 1845, _tapioca_ was also used as a manure. The Connecticut Tobacco growers a few years since used _corn-meal_ for manure, and you thought it a great waste of good food."
I think so still. But we will not discuss the matter now. Mr. Lawes wanted to ascertain whether _carbonaceous_ matter was needed by the growing wheat-plants, or whether they could get all they needed from the soil and the atmosphere. The enormous quant.i.ties of carbonaceous matter supplied by the barn-yard manure, it is quite evident, are of little value as a manure for wheat. And the rice seems to have done very little more good than we should expect from the 22 lbs. of nitrogen which it contained. The large quant.i.ty of carbonaceous matter evidently did little good. Available carbonaceous matter, such as starch, sugar, and oil, was intended as food for man and beast--not as food for wheat or tobacco.
The following table gives the results of the experiments the _fifth_ year, 1847-8.
Experiments at Rothamsted on the Growth of Wheat, Year After Year, on the Same Land.
Table V.--Manures and Produce; 5th Season, 1847-8. Manures and Seed (Old Red Lammas), Sown Autumn, 1847.
Manures FM Farm-yard Manure.
P-A Pearl-ash.
S-A Soda-ash.
SMg Sulphate of Magnesia.
SPL Superphosphate of Lime.
B-A Bone-ash.
SAc Sulphuric Acid (Sp. gr. 1.7.) MAc Muriatic Acid.
SAm Sulphate of Ammonia.
MAm Muriate of Ammonia.
RC Rape-Cake.
---+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
Manure per Acre, etc.
P +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----------------------+-----+-----+ l
Superphosphate
o
of Lime.
t
+-----+-----+-----+-----+
s
FM
P-A
S-A
SMg
SPL
B-A
SAc
MAc
SAm
MAm
RC
---+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
Tons
lbs.
lbs.
lbs.
lbs.
lbs.
lbs.
lbs.
lbs.
lbs.
lbs.
0
..
..
..
..
2240
..
..
..
..
..
..
1
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
2
14
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
3
Unmanured.
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
4
..
..
..
..
..
200
..
200
300
..
..
5
..
300
200
100
..
200
150
..
250
250
..
5
..
300
200
100
..
200
150
..
200
200
500
6
..
..
..
..
..
400
300
..
200
200
..
6
..
..
..
..
..
200
150
..
200
200
..
7
..
..
..
..
..
400
300
..
150
150
500
7
..
..
..
..
..
200
150
..
150
150
500
8
..
300
200
100
..
200
150
..
..
..
..
8
..
300
200
100
..
200
150
..
..
..
..
9
..
..
..
..
..
200
150
..
..
..
..
9
..
..
..
..
..
200
150
..
150
150
..
10
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
150
150
..
10
..
300
200
100
..
200
150
..
150
150
..
..
11
..
..
..
..
..
200
150
..
150
150
500
11
..
..
..
..
..
200
150
..
200
200
..
12
..
300
..
..
..
200
150
..
150
150
500
12
..
300
..
..
..
200
150
..
200
200
..
13
..
300
..
..
..
200
150
..
150
150
500
13
..
300
..
..
..
200
150
..
200
200
..
14
..
300
..
..
..
200
150
..
150
150
500
14
..
300
..
..
..
200
150
..
200
200
..
15
..
300
200
100
..
200
..
200
300
..
..
15
..
300
200
100
..
200
..
200
300
..
..
16
..
300
200
100
..
200
150
..
150
150
500
16
..
300
200
100
..
200
150
..
150
150
500
17
..
300
200
100
..
200
150
..
200
200
..
17
..
300
200
100
..
200
150
..
200
200
..
18
..
300
200
100
..
200
150
..
150
150
..
18
..
300
200
100
..
200
150
..
150
150
..
19
..
..
..
..
..
200
..
200
300
..
500
20
Unmanured.
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
21}
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
22}
---+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
Produce Wt/Bu Weight per Bushel.
OC Offal Corn.
TC Total Corn.
S&C Straw and Chaff.
TP/C&S Total Produce (Corn and Straw.) C Corn.
TP Total Produce.
OCD Offal Corn to 100 Dressed.
C100 Corn to 100 Straw.
----------------------------------+-----------------+----+-----+----
Increase per
Produce per Acre, &c.
Acre By Manure.
P --------------+----+----+----+----+-----+-----+-----+
l Dressed Corn.
o --------+-----+
TP
t Qty.
Wt/Bu
OC
TC
S&C
C&S
C
S&C
TP
OCD
C100
s --------+-----+----+----+----+----+-----+-----+-----+----+-----+---- Bu. Pks.
lbs.
lbs.
lbs.
lbs.
lbs.
lbs.
lbs.
lbs.
19 0
53.4
138
1259
2074
3333
307
362
669
13.4
60.7
0 16 0
59.6
160
1124
1735
2859
172
23
195
16.3
64.7
1 23 2
58.2
210
1705
3041
4746
753
1329
2082
13.8
56.0
2 14 3
57.3
106
952
1712
2664
..
..
..
12.1
55.6
3
24 0
58.5
172
1583
2713
4296
631
1001
1632
12.0
58.3
4
29 3
59.2
144
1911
3266
5177
959
1554
2513
7.9
58.5
5a 39 3
59.1
107
1932
3533
5465
980
1821
2801
5.8
57.5
5b 24 3
58.8
214
1672
2878
4550
720
1166
1886
14.6
58.0
6a 26 3
56.9
216
1737
2968
4705
785
1256
2041
14.0
58.5
6b 30 3
59.4
106
1936
3088
5024
984
1376
2360
5.7
62.6
7a 29 3
59.6
187
1963
3413
5376
1011
1701
2712
10.3
57.5
7b
19 3
56.2
154
1263
2317
3580
311
605
916
13.6
54.5
8a 19 0
59.4
127
1267
2148
3415
315
436
751
11.1
58.8
8b 18 2
56.7
125
1181
1945
3126
229
233
462
11.6
60.7
9a 25 0
53.3
208
1669
2918
4587
717
1206
1923
13.9
57.1
9b 19 1
58.1
215
1334
2367
3701
382
655
1037
19.0
56.3
10a 25 0
57.8
155
1604
2926
4530
652
1214
1866
10.6
54.8
10b
29 1
59.6
233
1984
3274
5258
1032
1562
2594
13.1
60.6
11a 24 3
57.9
207
1641
2898
4539
689
1186
1875
14.1
56.4
11b 29 3
59.3
174
1938
3390
5328
986
1678
2664
9.3
57.2
12a 26 0
59.2
167
1717
2880
4597
765
1168
1933
10.7
59.6
12b 29 1
57.9
253
1955
3290
5245
1003
1578
2581
14.7
59.4
13a 25 3
58.4
224
1730
3072
4802
778
1360
2138
14.6
56.3
13b 28 0
58.8
184
1834
3257
5091
882
1545
2427
11.1
56.3
14a 25 2
58.5
227
1726
2897
4623
774
1185
1959
15.1
59.5
14b
22 3
58.1
242
1571
2937
4508
619
1225
1844
18.1
53.4
15a 24 2
56.9
202
1607
3016
4623
655
1304
1959
14.1
53.2
15b
29 3
60.0
184
1973
3115
5088
1021
1403
2424
10.2
63.3
16a 30 1
58.4
171
1948
3380
5328
996
1668
2664
9.4
57.6
16b 27 2
59.7
285
1933
3296
5229
981
1584
2565
17.0
58.6
17a 28 3
59.7
222
1946
3324
5270
994
1612
2606
12.6
58.5
17b 26 3
59.2
150
1734
2935
4669
782
1223
2005
9.2
59.0
18a 26 2
59.6
215
1804
3056
4860
852
1344
2196
13.3
58.7
18b
29 1
56.2
185
1838
3295
5133
886
1583
2469
10.4
55.7
19 16 0
58.3
111
1050
1721
2771
98
9
107
11.3
61.0
20 .. ..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
}21
}22 --------+-----+----+----+----+----+-----+-----+-----+----+-----+----
This season was considered unfavorable for wheat. The continuously unmanured plot produced 14 bushels, and the plot receiving 14 tons of barn yard manure, 25 bushels per acre nearly.
300 lbs. of ammonia-salts alone on plot 10_a_, gave 19 bushels per acre, while the same quant.i.ty of ammonia, with superphosphate in addition, gave, on plot 9_b_, 25 bushels per acre.
The addition to the above manures of 300 lbs. of potash, 200 lbs. soda, and 100 lbs. sulphate of magnesia, on plot 10_b_, gave precisely the same yield per acre as the ammonia and the superphosphate alone. _The potash, soda, and magnesia, therefore, did no good._
400 lbs. of ammonia-salts, with superphosphate, potash, etc., gave, on plot 17_b_, nearly 29 bushels per acre, or 3 bushels more than the plot which has now received 70 tons of barn-yard manure in five successive years.
"I see that, on plot 0," said the Deacon, "one ton of superphosphate was used per acre, and it gave only half a bushel per acre more than 350 lbs. on 9_a_."
"This proves," said I, "that an excessive dose of superphosphate will do no harm. I am not sure that 100 lbs. of a good superphosphate _drilled in with the seed_, would not have done _as much good_ as a ton per acre."
"You say," remarked the Deacon, "that the season was unfavorable for wheat. And yet the no-manure plot produced nearly 15 bushels of wheat per acre."
"That is all true," said I, "and yet the season was undoubtedly an unfavorable one. This is shown not only in the less yield, but in the inferior quality of the grain. The 'dressed corn' on the no-manure plot this year only weighed 57? lbs. per bushel, while last year it weighed 61 lbs. per bushel."
"By the way," said the Doctor, "what do Messrs. Lawes and Gilbert mean by 'dressed corn'?"
"By 'corn,'" said I, "they mean wheat; and by 'dressed corn' they mean wheat that has been run through a fanning-mill until all the light and shrunken grain is blown or sieved out. In other words, 'dressed corn' is wheat carefully cleaned for market. The English farmers take more pains in cleaning their grain than we do. And this 'dressed corn' was as clean as a good fanning-mill could make it. You will observe that there was more 'offal corn' this year than last. This also indicates an unfavorable season."
"It would have been very interesting," said the Doctor, "if Messrs.
Lawes and Gilbert had a.n.a.lyzed the wheat produced by the different manures, so that we might have known something in regard to the quality of the flour as influenced by the use of different fertilizers."
"They did that very thing," said I, "and not only that, but they made the wheat grown on different plots, into flour, and ascertained the yield of flour from a given weight of wheat, and the amount of bran, middlings, etc., etc. They obtained some very interesting and important results. I was there at the time. But this is not the place to discuss the question. I am often amused, however, at the remarks we often hear in regard to the inferior quality of our wheat as compared to what it was when the country was new. Many seem to think that 'there is something lacking in the soil'--some say potash, and some phosphates, and some this, and some that. I believe nothing of the kind. Depend upon it, the variety of the wheat and the soil and season have much more to do with the quality or strength of the flour, than the chemical composition of the manures applied to the land."
"At any rate," said the Doctor, "we may be satisfied that anything that will produce a vigorous, healthy growth of wheat is favorable to quality. We may use manures in excess, and thus produce over-luxuriance and an unhealthy growth, and have poor, shrunken grain. In this case, it is not the use, but the abuse of the manure that does the mischief. We must not manure higher than the season will bear. As yet, this question rarely troubles us. Hitherto, as a rule, our seasons are better than our farming. It may not always be so. We may find the liberal use of manure so profitable that we shall occasionally use it in excess. At present, however, the tendency is all the other way. We have more grain of inferior quality from lack of fertility than from an excess of plant-food."
"That may be true," said I, "but we have more poor, inferior wheat from lack of draining and good culture, than from lack of plant-food.
Red-root, thistles, c.o.c.kle, and chess, have done more to injure the reputation of 'Genesee Flour,' than any other one thing, and I should like to hear more said about thorough cultivation, and the destruction of weeds, and less about soil exhaustion."
The following table shows the results of the experiments the _sixth year_, 1848-9.
Experiments at Rothamsted on the Growth of Wheat, Year After Year, on the Same Land.
Table VI.--Manures and Produce; 6th Season, 1848-9. Manures and Seed (Red Cl.u.s.ter), Sown Autumn, 1848.
Manures FM Farm-yard Manure.
P-A Pearl-ash.
S-A Soda-ash.