Cartwright ran out of the study toward the open door.

He turned to look back, but couldn't have seen her in the darkness at the top of the stairs, although she recognized him immediately. She then ran downstairs and into the study where she found her husband lying on the floor in a pool of blood. She immediately called me at home."

"Did you continue to question her?"

"No, I left a female officer with Mrs.

Elliot while I checked over her original statement. After a farther consultation with Detective Petrowski, I drove to Mr. Cartwright's home accompanied by two other officers, arrested the defendant and charged him with the murder of Ralph Elliot."

"Had he gone to bed?"

"No, he was still in the clothes he had been wearing on the television program that night."

"No more questions, your honor."

"Your witness, Mr. Davenport."

Fletcher walked across to the witness box with a smile on his face. "Good afternoon, Chief. I won't detain you for long, as I'm only tooaware how busy you are, but I do nevertheless have three or four questions that need answering." The chief didn't return Fletcher's smile. "To begin with, I would like to know what period of time passed between your receiving the phone call at your home from Mrs. Elliot, and when you placed Mr. Cartwright under arrest."

The chiefs fingers twitched again while he considered the question. "Two hours, two and a half at the most,"

he eventually said.

"And when you arrived at Mr. Cartwright's house, how was he dressed?"

"I've already told the court that-in exactly the same clothes as he was wearing on television that night."

"So he didn't open the door in his pajamas and dressing gown looking as if he had just got out of bed?"

"No, he didn't," said the chief, puzzled.

"Don't you think that a man who had just committed a murder might want to get undressed and into bed at two o'clock in the morning, so that should the police suddenly turn up on his doorstep, he could at least give an impression of having been asleep?"

The chief frowned. "He was comforting his wife."

"I see," said Fletcher. "The murderer was comforting his wife, so let me ask you, Chief, when you arrested Mr. Cartwright, did he make a statement?"

"No," the chief replied, "he said he wanted to speak to his lawyer first."

"But did he say anything at all that you might have recorded in your trusty notebook?"

"Yes," said the chief, and flipped back some pages of the notebook before carefully studying an entry. "Yes," he repeated with a smile, "Cartwright said, "but he was still alive when I left him.""

"But he was still alive when I left him," repeated Fletcher. "Hardly the words of a man who is trying to hide the fact that he had been there at all. He doesn't get undressed, he doesn't go to bed, and heopenly admits he was at Elliot's house earlier that evening." The chief remained silent.

"When he accompanied you to the police station, did you take his fingerprints?"

"Yes, of course."

"Did you carry out any other tests?" asked Fletcher.

"What did you have in mind?" asked the chief.

"Don't play games with me," said Fletcher, his voice revealing a slight edge. "Did you carry out any other tests?"

"Yes," said the chief. "We checked under his fingernails to see if there was any sign that he had fired a gun."

"And was there any indication that Mr. Cartwright had fired a gun?" asked Fletcher, returning to his more conciliatory tone.

The chief hesitated. "We could find no powder residue on his hands or under his fingernails."

"There was no powder residue on his hands or under his fingernails," said Fletcher, facing the jury.

"Yes, but he'd had a couple of hours to wash his hands and scrub his nails."

"He certainly did, Chief, and he also had a couple of hours to get undressed, go to bed, turn off all the lights in the house, and come up with a far more convincing line than, "but he was still alive when I left him."" Fletcher's eyes never left the jury. Once again, the chief remained silent.

"My final question, Mr. Culver, is something that's been nagging at me ever since I took on this case, especially when I think about your thirty-six years of experience, fourteen of them as chief of police." He turned back to face Culver.

"Did it ever cross your mind that someone else might have committed this crime?"

"There was no sign of anyone else having entered the house other than Mr. Cartwright."

"But there was already someone else in the house."

"And there was absolutely no evidence of any kind to suggest that Mrs. Elliot could possibly have been involved."

"No evidence of any kind?" repeatedFletcher. "I do hope, Chief, that you will find time in your busy schedule to drop in and hear my cross-examination of Mrs. Elliot, when the jury will be able to decide if there was absolutely no evidence of any kind to show she might have been involved in this crime." Uproar broke out in the courtroom as everyone began talking at once.

The state's attorney leaped to his feet, "Objection, your honor," he said sharply. "It's not Mrs. Elliot who is on trial." But he could not be heard above the noise of the judge banging his gavel as Fletcher walked slowly back to his place.

When the judge had managed to bring some semblance of order back to proceedings, all Fletcher said was, "No more questions, your honor."

"Do you have any evidence?" Nat whispered as his counsel sat down.

"Not a lot," admitted Fletcher, "but one thing I feel confident about is that if Mrs. Elliot did kill her husband, she won't be getting a lot of sleep between now and when she enters that witness stand. And as for Ebden, he'll be spending the next few days wondering what we've come up with that he doesn't yet know about." Fletcher smiled at the chief as he stepped down from the witness stand, but received a cold, blank stare in response.

The judge looked down from the bench at both attorneys. "I think that's enough for today, gentlemen,"

he said. "We will convene again at ten o'clock tomorrow morning, when Mr. Ebden may call his next witness."

"All rise."

when the judge made his entrance the following morning, only a change of tie gave any clue that he had ever left the building. Nat wondered how long it would be before the ties also began to make a second and even a third appearance.

"Good morning," said Judge Kravats as he took his place on the bench and beamed down at the assembled throng as though he were a benevolent preacher about to address his congregation. "Mr. Ebden," hesaid, "you may call your next witness."

"Thank you, your honor. I call Detective Petrowski."

Fletcher studied the senior detective carefully as he made his way to the witness stand. He raised his right hand and began to recite the oath.

Petrowski could barely have passed the minimum height the force required of its recruits. His tight-fitting suit implied a wrestler's build, rather than someone who was overweight. His jaw was square, his eyes narrow and his lips curled slightly down at the edges, leaving an impression that he didn't smile that often. One of Fletcher's researchers had found out that Petrowski was rumored to be the next chief when Don Culver retired. He had a reputation for sticking by the book, but hating paperwork, much preferring to be visiting the scene of the crime than sitting behind a desk back at headquarters.

"Good morning, Captain," said the state's attorney once the witness had sat down.

Petrowski nodded, but still didn't smile. "For the record, would you please state your name and rank."

"Frank Petrowski, chief of detectives, City of Hartford Police Department."

"And how long have you been a detective?"

"Fourteen years."

"And when were you appointed chief of detectives?"

"Three years ago."

"Having established your record, let us move on to the night of the murder. The police log shows that you were the first officer on the scene of the crime."

"Yes, I was," said Petrowski, "I was the senior officer on duty that night, having taken over from the chief at eight o'clock."

"And where were you at two thirty that morning when the chief called in?"

"I was in a patrol car, on the way to investigate a break-in at a warehouse on Marsham Street, when the desk sergeant phoned to say the chief wanted me to go immediately to the home of Ralph Elliot in West Hartford, and investigate a possible homicide. As I wasonly minutes away, I took on the assignment and detailed another patrol car to cover Marsham Street."

"And you drove straight to the Elliots' home?"

"Yes, but on the way I radioed in to headquarters to let them know that I would be needing the assistance of forensics and the best photographer they could get out of bed at that time in the morning."

"And what did you find when you arrived at the Elliots' house?"

"I was surprised to discover that the front door was open and Mrs. Elliot was crouched on the floor in the hallway. She told me that she had found her husband's body in the study, and pointed to the other end of the corridor. She added that the chief had told her not to touch anything, which was why the front door had been left open. I went straight to the study, and once I had confirmed that Mr. Elliot was dead, I returned to the hallway and took a statement from his wife, copies of which are in the court's possession."

"What did you do next?"

"In her statement, Mrs. Elliot said that she had been asleep when she heard two shots coming from downstairs, so I and three other officers returned to the study to search for the bullets."

"And did you find them?"

"Yes. The first was easy to locate because after it had passed through Mr. Elliot's heart it ended up embedded in the wooden panel behind his desk. The second took a little longer to find, but we eventually spotted it lodged in the ceiling above Mr. Elliot's bureau."

"Could these two bullets have been fired by the same person?" "It's possible," said Petrowski, "if the murderer had wanted to leave the impression of a struggle, or the victim had turned the gun on himself."

"Is that common in a homicide case?"

"It's not unknown for a criminal to try and leave conflicting evidence.""But can you prove that both bullets came from the same gun?" "That was confirmed by ballistics the following day." "And were any fingerprints found on the firearm?" "Yes," said Petrowski, "a palm mark on the handle of the gun, plus an index finger on the trigger."

"And were you later able to match up these samples?"

"Yes," he paused. "They both matched Mr.

Cartwright's prints." A babble of chatter erupted from the public benches behind Fletcher. He tried not to blink as he observed the jury's reaction to this piece of information. A moment later he scribbled a note on his yellow pad. The judge banged his gavel several times as he called for order, before Ebden was able to resume.

"From the entry of the bullet into the body, and the burn marks on the chest, were you able to ascertain what distance the murderer was from his victim?"

"Yes," said Petrowski. "Forensics estimated that the assailant must have been standing four to five feet in front of his victim, and from the angle which the bullet entered the body, they were able to show that both men were standing at the time."

"Objection, your honor," said Fletcher, rising from his place. "We have yet to prove that it was a man who fired either shot." "Sustained."

"And when you had gathered all your evidence,"

continued Ebden as if he had not been interrupted, "was it you who made the decision to arrest Mr. Cartwright?"

"No, by then the chief had turned up, and although it was my case, I asked if he would also take a statement from Mrs. Elliot, to make sure her story hadn't changed in any way."

"And had it?"

"No, on all the essential points, it remained consistent."

Fletcher underlined the word essential as both Petrowski and the chief had used it. Wellrehearsed or a coincidence, he wondered.

"Was that when you decided to arrest the accused?"

"Yes, it was on my recommendation, but ultimately the chiefs decision."

"Weren't you taking a tremendous risk, arresting a gubernatorial candidate during an election campaigin?"

"Yes, we were, and I discussed that problem with the chief. We often find to our cost that the first twenty-four hours are the most important in any investigation, and we had a body, two bullets and a witness to the crime. I considered it would have been an abrogation of my duty not to make an arrest simply because the assailant had powerful friends."

"Objection, your honor, that was prejudicial,"

said Fletcher.

"Sustained," said the judge, "and strike it from the record." He turned to Petrowski and added, "Please stick to facts, detective, I'm not interested in your opinions."

Petrowski nodded.

Fletcher turned to Nat. "That last statement sounded to me as if it had been written in the DA'S office." He paused, looked down at his yellow pad and commented that "abrogation," "essential points," and "assailant" were delivered as if they had been learned by heart. "Petrowski won't have the opportunity to deliver rehearsed answers when I cross-examine him."

"Thank you, Captain," said Ebden, "I have no more questions for Detective Petrowski, your honor."

"Do you wish to question this witness?" asked the judge, preparing himself for another tactical maneuver.

"Yes, I most certainly do, your honor."

Fletcher remained seated while he turned a page of his legal pad. "Detective Petrowski, you told the court that my client's fingerprints were on the gun."

"Not just his fingerprints, also a palm print on the butt as confirmed in the forensic report."