"And what happens if you take the Leaver premise, that man belongs to the world?"

"Then creation goes on forever."

"How does that sound?"

"It has my vote."

6.

"Something occurs to me," I said.

"Yes?"

"It occurs to me that the story I just told is in fact the story the Leavers have been enacting here for three million years. The Takers' story is, 'The gods made the world for man, but they botched the job, so we had to take matters into our own, more competent hands.' The Leavers' story is, 'The gods made man for the world, the same way they made salmon and sparrows and rabbits for the world; this seems to have worked pretty well so far, so we can take it easy and leave the running of the world to the gods.' "

"That's right. There are other ways to tell it, just as there are other ways to tell the story of the Takers, but this way of telling it is as good as any."

I sat there for a while. "I'm thinking about . . . the meaning of the world, divine intentions in the world, and the destiny of man. According to this story."

"Go ahead."

"The meaning of the world . . . I think the third chapter of Genesis had it right. It's a garden-the gods' garden. I say this even though I myself very much doubt that gods have anything to do with it. I just find this a wholesome and encouraging way to think of it."

"I understand."

"And there are two trees in the garden, one for the gods and one for us. The one for them is the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil, and the one for us is the Tree of Life. But we can only find the Tree of Life if we stay in the garden-and we can only stay in the garden if we keep our hands off the gods' tree."

Ishmael gave me a nod of encouragement.

"Divine intentions . . . It would seem . . . There is a sort of tendency in evolution, wouldn't you say? If you start with those ultrasimple critters in the ancient seas and move up step by step to everything we see here now-and beyond-then you have to observe a tendency toward . . . complexity. And toward selfawareness and intelligence. Wouldn't you agree?"

"Yes."

"That is, all sorts of creatures on this planet appear to be on the verge of attaining that selfawareness and intelligence. So it's definitely not just humans that the gods are after. We were never meant to be the only players on this stage. Apparently the gods intend this planet to be a garden filled filled with creatures that are selfaware and intelligent." with creatures that are selfaware and intelligent."

"So it would appear. And if this is so, then man's destiny would seem to be plain."

"Yes. Amazingly enough, it is is plain-because man is the first of all these. He's the trailblazer, the pathfinder. His destiny is to be the first to learn that creatures like man have a choice: They can try to thwart the gods and perish in the attempt-or they can stand aside and make some room for all the rest. But it's more than that. His destiny is to be the father of them all-I don't mean by direct descent. By giving all the rest their chance-the whales and the dolphins and the chimps and the raccoons-he becomes in some sense their progenitor. . . . Oddly enough, it's even grander than the destiny the Takers dreamed up for us." plain-because man is the first of all these. He's the trailblazer, the pathfinder. His destiny is to be the first to learn that creatures like man have a choice: They can try to thwart the gods and perish in the attempt-or they can stand aside and make some room for all the rest. But it's more than that. His destiny is to be the father of them all-I don't mean by direct descent. By giving all the rest their chance-the whales and the dolphins and the chimps and the raccoons-he becomes in some sense their progenitor. . . . Oddly enough, it's even grander than the destiny the Takers dreamed up for us."

"How so?"

"Just think. In a billion years, whatever is around then, whoever whoever is around then, says, 'Man? Oh yes, is around then, says, 'Man? Oh yes, man man! What a wonderful creature he was! It was within his grasp to destroy the entire world and to trample all our futures into the dust-but he saw the light before it was too late and pulled back. He pulled back and gave the rest of us our chance. He showed us all how it had to be done had to be done if the world was to go on being a garden forever. Man was the role model for us all!' " if the world was to go on being a garden forever. Man was the role model for us all!' "

"Not a shabby destiny."

"Not a shabby destiny by any means. And it occurs to me that this . . ."

"Yes?"

"This gives a little shape to the story. The world is a very, very fine place. It wasn't a mess. It didn't need to be conquered and ruled by man. In other words, the world doesn't need to belong to man-but it does does need man to belong to need man to belong to it it. Some Some creature had to be the first to go through this, had to see that there were two trees in the garden, one that was good for gods and one that was good for creatures. creature had to be the first to go through this, had to see that there were two trees in the garden, one that was good for gods and one that was good for creatures. Some Some creature had to find the way, and if that happened, then . . . there was just no limit to what could happen here. In other words, man does have a place in the world, but it's not his place to creature had to find the way, and if that happened, then . . . there was just no limit to what could happen here. In other words, man does have a place in the world, but it's not his place to rule rule. The gods have that in hand. Man's place is to be the first. Man's place is to be the first without being the last without being the last. Man's place is to figure out how it's possible possible to do that-and then to make some room for all the rest who are capable of becoming what he's become. And maybe, when the time comes, it's man's place to be the teacher of all the rest who are capable of becoming what he's become. Not the only teacher, not the ultimate teacher. Maybe only the first teacher, the kindergarten teacher-but even that wouldn't be too shabby. And do you know what?" to do that-and then to make some room for all the rest who are capable of becoming what he's become. And maybe, when the time comes, it's man's place to be the teacher of all the rest who are capable of becoming what he's become. Not the only teacher, not the ultimate teacher. Maybe only the first teacher, the kindergarten teacher-but even that wouldn't be too shabby. And do you know what?"

"What?"

"All along, I've been saying to myself, 'Yes, this is all very interesting, but what good is it? This isn't going to change anything!' "

"And now?"

"This is what we need. Not just is what we need. Not just stopping stopping things. Not just things. Not just less less of things. People need something positive to work for. They need a vision of something that . . . I don't know. Something that . . ." of things. People need something positive to work for. They need a vision of something that . . . I don't know. Something that . . ."

"I think what you're groping for is that people need more than to be scolded, more than to be made to feel stupid and guilty. They need more than a vision of doom. They need a vision of the world and of themselves that inspires them."

"Yes. Definitely. Stopping pollution is not inspiring. Sorting your trash is not inspiring. Cutting down on fluorocarbons is not inspiring. But this . . . thinking of ourselves in a new way, thinking of the world in a new way . . . This . . ."

I let it go. What the hell, he knew what I was trying to say.

7.

"I trust you now see a point I made when we first began. The story being enacted here by the Takers is not in any sense chapter two of the story that was being enacted here during the first three million years of human life. The Leaver story has its own chapter two."

"What is is its chapter two?" its chapter two?"

"You've just outlined it, haven't you?"

"I'm not sure."

Ishmael spent a moment in thought. "We'll never know what the Leavers of Europe and Asia were up to when the people of your culture came along to plow them under forever. But we do know what they were up to here in North America. They were looking for ways to achieve settlement that were in accord with the way they'd always lived, ways that left room for the rest of life to go on around them. I don't mean that they did this out of any sense of highmindedness. I simply mean that it didn't occur to them to take the life of the world into their own hands and to declare war on the rest of the community of life. Proceeding in this way for another five thousand years or ten thousand years, a dozen civilizations might have appeared on this continent as sophisticated as yours is now, each with its own values and objectives. It's not unthinkable."

"No, it's not. Or rather, yes it is. According to Taker mythology, every civilization anywhere in the universe must be a Taker Taker civilization, a civilization in which people have taken the life of the world into their own hands. That's so obvious it doesn't need to be pointed out. Hell, every alien civilization in the history of science fiction has been a Taker civilization. Every civilization ever encountered by the U.S.S. civilization, a civilization in which people have taken the life of the world into their own hands. That's so obvious it doesn't need to be pointed out. Hell, every alien civilization in the history of science fiction has been a Taker civilization. Every civilization ever encountered by the U.S.S. Enterprise Enterprise has been a Taker civilization. This is because it goes without saying that any intelligent creature anywhere will insist on taking his life out of the hands of the gods, will know that the world belongs to him and not the other way around." has been a Taker civilization. This is because it goes without saying that any intelligent creature anywhere will insist on taking his life out of the hands of the gods, will know that the world belongs to him and not the other way around."

"True."

"Which raises an important question in my mind. What exactly would it mean mean to belong to the world at this point? Obviously you're not saying that only huntergatherers truly belong to the world." to belong to the world at this point? Obviously you're not saying that only huntergatherers truly belong to the world."

"I'm glad you see that. Though if the Bushmen of Africa or the Kalapalo of Brazil (if there are any left by now) want to go on living that way for the next ten million years, I can't see how this can be anything less than beneficial for them and for the world."

"True. But that doesn't answer my question. How can civilized people belong to the world?"

Ishmael shook his head in what looked like a mixture of impatience and exasperation. "Civilized has nothing to do with it. How can tarantulas belong to the world? How can sharks belong to the world?"

"I don't understand."

"Look around you and you'll see some creatures who act as though the world belongs to them and some creatures who act as though they belong to the world. Can you tell them apart?"

"Yes."

"The creatures who act as though they belong to the world follow the peacekeeping law, and because they follow that law, they give the creatures around them a chance to grow toward whatever it's possible for them to become. That's how man came into being. The creatures around Australopithecus Australopithecus didn't imagine that the world belonged to them, so they let him live and grow. How does being civilized come into it? Does being civilized mean that you didn't imagine that the world belonged to them, so they let him live and grow. How does being civilized come into it? Does being civilized mean that you have have to destroy the world?" to destroy the world?"

"No."

"Does being civilized make you incapable incapable of giving the creatures around you a little space in which to live?" of giving the creatures around you a little space in which to live?"

"No."

"Does it make you incapable of living as harmlessly as sharks and tarantulas and rattlesnakes?"

"No."

"Does it make you incapable of following a law that even snails and earthworms manage to follow without any difficulty?"

"No."

"As I pointed out some time ago, human settlement isn't against against the law, it's the law, it's subject subject to the law-and the same is true of civilization. So what exactly is your question?" to the law-and the same is true of civilization. So what exactly is your question?"

"I don't know, now. Obviously belonging to the world means . . . belonging to the same club as everyone else. The club being the community of life. It means belonging to the club and following the same rules as everyone else."

"And if being civilized means anything at all, it should mean that you're leaders of the club, not its only criminals and destroyers."

"True," I said, then sat there blinking for a few moments. "Something you said a moment ago. We'll never know what the Leavers of Europe or Asia were up to when the people of my culture arrived to plow them under."

"Yes?"

"I think some information about that has has been dug up in recent years." been dug up in recent years."

Ishmael nodded. "If it's recent, then I might well not have heard of it."

"An archeologist named Riane Eisler wrote about a widespread Leaver agricultural society that existed in Europe until it was overrun by the Takers five or six thousand years ago. Except she didn't call them Leavers and Takers, of course. I don't know a lot about it, but evidently the culture the Takers plowed under was based on goddess worship."

Ishmael nodded. "One of my students was aware of the book you're talking about but was unable to explain its significance as you've done. It's called, I believe, The Chalice and the Blade The Chalice and the Blade."

8.

"Returning to the subject of inspiration, it seems to me that these days you have another promising source of it," Ishmael said.

"What's that?"

"All my other pupils, when they reached this point, said, 'Yes, yes, this is wonderful-but people are not going to relinquish their hold on the world. It just can't happen. Never. Not in a thousand years.' And I had nothing I could point to as a hopeful example to the contrary. Now I do."

It took me about ninety seconds to see it. "I assume you mean what's been happening in the Soviet Union and eastern Europe in the past few years."

"That's right. Ten years ago, twenty years ago, anyone predicting that Marxism would soon be dismantled from the top from the top would have been labeled a hopeless visionary, an utter fool." would have been labeled a hopeless visionary, an utter fool."

"Yes, that's true."

"But once the people of these countries were inspired by the possibility of a new way of life, the dismantling took place almost overnight."

"Yes, I see what you mean. Five years ago I would have said that no amount of inspiration could accomplish that-or this."

"And now?"

"And now it's just barely thinkable. Improbable as hell but not unimaginable."

9.

"But I do have another question," I added.

"Proceed."

"Your ad said, 'Must earnestly desire to save the world.' "

"Yes?"

"What do I do if I earnestly desire to save the world?"

Ishmael frowned at me through the bars for a long moment. "You want a program?"

"Of course I want a program."

"Then here is a program: The story of Genesis must be reversed. First, Cain must stop murdering Abel. This is essential if you're to survive. The Leavers are the endangered species most critical to the world-not because they're humans but because they alone can show the destroyers of the world that there is no one right way one right way to live. And then, of course, you must spit out the fruit of that forbidden tree. You must absolutely and forever relinquish the idea that you know who should live and who should die on this planet." to live. And then, of course, you must spit out the fruit of that forbidden tree. You must absolutely and forever relinquish the idea that you know who should live and who should die on this planet."

"Yes, I see all that, but that's a program for mankind mankind, that's not a program for me me. What do I I do?" do?"

"What you do is to teach a hundred what I've taught you, and inspire each of them to teach a hundred. That's how it's always done."

"Yes, but . . . is it enough enough?"