1633 epidemic: Snow and Lanphear 1998.

3 / In the Land of Four Quarters Pizarro's body: Maples and Browning 1994:21319.

Ezell thesis: Ezell 1961.

Dobyns in Peru and Mexico: Interviews, Dobyns; Dobyns 2004.

Prescott as first full history: As opposed to colonial-era accounts.

Politicization of Andean studies: Beyers 2001. Among the better known examples (and actually a pretty good book) is Baudin 1961.

Dobyns's 1963 article: Dobyns 1963.

Comparison of Inka realm to other states in 1491: Fernandez-Armesto 2001:390402 ("imperial potential," 395).

Inka realm as empire: Peruvian historian Maria Rostworowski de Diez Canseco has argued that because the term "empire" has "Old World connotations"-it implies a sophisticated center that dominates "barbarians" on the periphery, as was the case for Rome-it should not be applied to the Inka, who overran societies bigger and more cosmopolitan than themselves (Rostworowski de Diez Canseco 1999:x). Although one can see what she means, the word is now used loosely to describe a situation in which "a core polity gains control over a range of other societies" (D'Altroy 2002:6). And the Inka did exactly that.

Inka goals, methods: "The Inkas were coolly pragmatic, efficient, and totalitarian in their policies toward conquered nations, [attempting to impose] a restrictive area wide standardization of politics, religion, customs, and language.... They maintained order by instilling fear and using force rather than by encouraging knowledgeable participation" (Dobyns and Doughty 1976:4849).

Inka road system: Hyslop 1984:esp. 21524, 34243. The network appears to have been planned carefully (Jenkins 2001:65587).

"not with the Wars": Rowe 1946:329.

"where millions": Quoted in Lechtman 1996a:15. My next sentence is a revamped version of Lechtman's sentence following the quotation.

Steepest street: Filbert Street. I am grateful to Wade Roush for checking this comparison.

"a wide range": Diamond 1997:140.

20 of 34 life zones: Burger 1992:12. Only 2 percent of Peru is today considered suitable for agriculture (ibid.).

"vertical archipelagoes": Murra 1967.

Inka origin accounts: Cobo 1979:10307 ("extreme ignorance," 20; "ridiculous," 103).

Betanzos: Betanzos 1996 ("thirty small," 13; "two hundred," 19). For a discussion of his value as a source, see Fossa 2000.

Inkas vs. Chankas, Wiraqocha Inka vs. Inka Yupanki: Betanzos 1996:1943 ("To this," 33; "crazy impulse," 36); Cieza de Leon 1998:317 (Pizarro sees skins); Cobo 1979:13033 ("valiant prince," 130); Pachacuti Yamqui Salcamayhua 1879:27073; D'Altroy 2002:6265; Rostworowski de Diez Canseco 2001:78119; Santa 1963. Three of the fifteen Spanish accounts of Inka history claim that Wiraqocha Inka, not Inka Yupanki, fought the Chankas and then his father. Among them is Cobo, who confusingly attributes what seem to be the same events to both. Rostworowski de Diez Canseco (1999:2834) convincingly argues against Wiraqocha. Pachakuti literally means "he who remakes the world" or "he who turns over time and space," but I have followed Michael Moseley in an attempt to suggest how the name might have struck Inka ears (Moseley 2001:14).

Inka chronology: John H. Rowe laid out the timeline of the empire in an influential article (Rowe 1946:203). Rowe relied on the calculation in a manuscript from 1586, still not published in its entirety, by Father Miguel Cabello Balboa (Cabello Balboa 1920). A Swedish historian, ke Wedin, fiercely criticized Rowe's use of this and other sources (Wedin 1963, 1966). An insurmountable problem with the accounts, Wedin insisted, was that they were not drawn from interviews with the elite record keepers who actually kept track of events. The implication was that most other Indians were as reliably informed about their society's history as, say, average U.S. citizens are about their society's history. Since Wedin's work historians have come to place a little more trust in Spanish chronicles, which although not taken from record keepers tended to be drawn from interviews with the educated elite. In addition, radiocarbon dating seems generally to support the chronology (Michczynski and Adamska 1997). Rowe's chronology is now typically viewed as roughly correct, though subject to debate.

Fall of Chincha: Castro and Ortega Morejon 1974:91104 ("son of the Sun," 93; "Everything," 95). My thanks to Robert Crease for obtaining this article for me. See also Santillan 1879:14; Sarmiento de Gamboa 2000:11314, 135 (brother left in command). As Sarmiento de Gamboa notes, Chincha was a minor incident in a much larger campaign against the bigger polity of Chimor (see Chap. 6). The rising claim on local labor both reflected a deliberate strategy by the Inka state of gradually increasing control and a rise in labor demand in the Inka state itself (Morris 1993:3650).

Luttwak's book: Luttwak 1976.

Inka as hegemonic empire: D'Altroy 1987; Hassig 1985.

Austere, contemporary feel of Inka art and architecture: Paternosto 1996:21922 (influence on twentieth-century art); Thomson 2003:6062, 8687, 24649.

Qosqo and Awkaypata: Rowe 1991, 1990. I thank Patricia Lyon for sending me a copy of these articles. Descriptions of the structures are in Sarmiento de Gamboa 2000:8591.

"point of a pin": Pizarro 1969:27273. He was describing Saqsawaman fortress, at the edge of town, but the same is true of the structures in central Qosqo. Sancho was similarly impressed (Sancho 1917:15657). One viceroy wrote in 1571 that an Inka fortress was "the work of the devil...for it does not seem possible that the strength and skill of men could have made it" (quoted in Wright 2005:57).

Zeq'e and Wak'a: D'Altroy 2002:15567 ("otherwise diligent," 156 [D'Altroy closed his remark by wryly noting "(see below)"]). He relied on Bauer 1998, which I have also done. The classic colonial account is from Cobo 1990:5184 ("more than a thousand," 9). But as a Booknews reviewer dryly noted, Cobo "based his account of [Inka] religion almost entirely on previous literature (his employer having eradicated his subject)."

Calendar: The Inka calendar and their means of reckoning time were so complex that I have basically ducked and avoided them. See instead Aveni 1995:278304.

Inka economics and labor system: Cobo 1979:18993, 21134; La Lone 1982:31236; Murra 1980; Rostworowski de Diez Canseco 2001:182201; D'Altroy 2002:26386.

Absence of money in Europe: Braudel 198184 (vol. 1):46768.

"managed to eradicate": Vargas Llosa 1992:26.

Population reshuffling: Cieza de Leon 1959:5963; Cobo 1979:18993; D'Altroy 2002:24849; Rowe 1946:26970.

Disproportionate size of conquest: The contrast between the tiny Spanish force and the vast Inka empire was noted as early as 1534, in the first narrative of the conquest, Verdadera relacion de la conquista del Peru, by Francisco de Xerez. "When in ancient times have such few [triumphed] against so many?" he crowed. "And who has equaled those of Spain? Certainly not the Jews nor the Greeks nor Romans, about whom most is told." Although the Romans subjugated many lands, Jerez said, "it was with equal or greater numbers of people, in known territories, provided with the usual sustenance, and with paid captains and armies. But our Spaniards...were never more than two or three hundred, sometimes a hundred or even less.... And the many times they traveled, they were neither paid nor forced but went of their own will and at their own cost" (Xerez 1938:1617).

Inka "crown" and clothes, saving of waste: Pizarro 1969:22226 (clothing and headband); Cobo 1979:24447; Ruiz de Arce 1933:361 (spittle), cited in Hemming 2004:51; Rowe 1946:25859.

Thupa Inka's grandeur, military career: Sarmiento de Gamboa 2000:11219, 12223 ("worshiped and adored," 112); D'Altroy 2002:6774. The description of the litter is from Thupa Inka's successor, but seems to apply in general (Pachacuti Yamqui Salcamayhua 1879:79).

Thupa Inka's marriage(s): Betanzos 1996:11920; Cobo 1979:142; D'Altroy 2002:10306. As Rowe notes, multiple sister-marriages were embedded in Inka culture-the leader of the four brothers who arrived in Qosqo married his four sisters (Rowe 1946:31718). In addition, Andean societies traditionally recognized that a man owed obligations to his sister's son. By ensuring that his nephew was also his son, the Inka tried to reduce the potential for intrafamilial conflict (Rostworowski de Diez Canseco 2001:10304).

Troubled accession of Wayna Qhapaq: Sarmiento de Gamboa 2000:13338; Pachacuti Yamqui Salcamayhua 1879:29397; Rostworowski de Diez Canseco 2001:10405. According to one report, Wayna Qhapaq was sixteen (Anello Oliva 1998:77). See also, Penaherrera de Costales and Costales Samienego 1964.

Makework projects: Cieza de Leon 1959:77 ("mountain"), 13738.

Ecuador campaign: Cobo 1979:15560 ("commanded," 155, "prepared himself," 156); Betanzos 1996:18283; Cieza de Leon 1959:4650, 7778; Cabello Balboa 1920:84108; Niles 1999:97105. Betanzos, but not Cobo, mentions Atawallpa's disgrace; Cobo, but not Betanzos, describes Wayna Qhapaq's discomfiture; omissions are consonant with the chroniclers' biases.

"When his captains": Pizarro 1969:19899, 228 (vampire-bat wool).

Wayna Qhapaq's death, succession battle: Cieza de Leon 1959:7887; 1998:18793; Pachacuti Yamqui Salcamayhua 1879:30924; Sarmiento de Gamboa 2000:14460; Cabello Balboa 1920:11321, 12872; Anello Oliva 1998:8792. A clear summary is D'Altroy 2002:7683; see also, Rostworowski de Diez Canseco 2001:11025. Betanzos's narrative, though useful, is understandably biased; his wife was Atawallpa's sister (Betanzos 1996:183234). Pedro Pizarro's version of events interestingly highlights the internal politics of Qosqo (Pizarro 1969:198206). Garcilaso de la Vega says that Wayna Qhapaq's death followed omens and prophecies of the collapse of the empire, which seems unlikely. If true, though, it may account for a certain fatalism toward the Spanish among the Inka elite (Gheerbrant ed. 1962:28489). He also suggests that the war occurred after Wayna Qhapaq split up Tawantinsuyu in a Lear-like fashion, giving Atawallpa a rump kingdom to the north. Most ethnographers and historians disagree. Garcilaso's description of the war itself as consisting in essence of a single big engagement outside Qosqo is at variance with other accounts.

Washkar's marriage and his mother's marriage: Pachacuti Yamqui Salcamayhua 1879:308; Cabello Balboa 1920:12021 ("begging," 121).

Cieza de Leon casualty estimates: Cieza de Leon 1959:84 (16,000), 87 (35,000).

Skull cup: "I saw the head with the skin, the dried flesh, and its hair, and it had the teeth closed, and between them was a silver straw, and attached to the top of the head was a gold cup [with a hole in the bottom that entered the skull], from which he drank when memories of [Atawallpa's] war against his brother came to mind; he put chicha in the cup, from which it came out through the mouth, and he drank through the straw" (Mena 1930:25053). The cup is also mentioned in Cieza de Leon 1959:84.

Pizarro and Atawallpa at Cajamarca: I draw mainly on Hemming 2004:3085. See also, Sancho 1917:919; Mena 1930:23181; Pizarro 1969:171221 ("made water," 17980); Ruiz de Arce 1933:363 ("mounds"), cited in Hemming 2004:42.

Spaniards and gold: Restall 2003:2223 ("nonperishable," 23), 3437, 6567.

"What could," "No amount": Hemming 2004:115, 158. See also the vigorously argued Guilmartin 1991.

Marveling at failure to develop steel: "It is worthy of remark, that...the Peruvians, in their progress towards civilization, should never have detected the use of iron, which lay around them in abundance" (Prescott 2000:810).

Andean metallurgy: Burger and Gordon 1998; Lechtman 1996b ("hardness," 35; "plasticity," 37); 1993 ("eminent scholar," 253); 1984.

Different contexts of technology: Interviews, Lechtman ("people solved"), Conklin, Leonard Morse-Fortier (force of sling projectiles); Ihde 2000.

Inka ships: Cieza de Leon 1998: 7576; Heyerdahl 1996; Hemming 2004:25; Prescott 2000:85455; interview, Vranich (replica boat created for documentary). See the account of the new ship at http://www.reedboat.org.

"without endangering themselves": Sancho 1917:62.

Importance and fineness of textiles in Tawantinsuyu: Murra 1964 (stripping soldiers, 718); Lechtman 1993:25459 (five hundred threads per inch, 257). "The [cotton] clothes they made were so fine that we [Spaniards] thought they were made of silk, worked with figures of beaten gold, beautifully made" (Mena 1930:225).

Cloth armor: Lechtman 1993:256; Murra 1964:718 (stripping of soldiers); Rowe 1946:27475; Montell 1929:Fig. 21.

"with such force": Enriquez de Guzman 1862:99.

Inka rebellion with flaming missiles: Hemming 2004:19394; Prescott 2000:102123.

Inka armies and horses: Hemming 2004 ("Even when," 11112; "dreaded," 158).

Inka roads and horses: Letter, Pizarro, H., to Oidores of Santo Domingo, 23 Nov. 1533, quoted in Hemming 2004:31 ("so bad"); Prescott 2000:954. On one steep road "all made of steps of very small stones," Pedro Sancho wrote, Pizarro's "horses toiled so much that, when they had finished going up, the greater part of them had lost their shoes and worn down the hoofs of all four feet" (Sancho 1917:63).

Inka military techniques: Sancho 1917:67; Hemming 2004:195 (bolas); Prescott 2000:922, 984.

Historians ignore disease: Interviews, Crosby, Denevan, Dobyns. According to Dobyns, "the published works focused on New World historic epidemiology could be counted on the fingers of one hand" at that time (Dobyns 1995). Actually, Dobyns's own count is eighteen articles prior to 1964. Still, most researchers in the field did not "seem to be paying much attention" (ibid.), e.g., the claim that "not until 1720 did any great losses through pestilence occur in Peru" (Kubler 1946:336). Peruvian researchers noted the epidemics (Patron 1894 [proposing that Wayna Qhapaq died of bartonellosis, not smallpox]), but others were like U.S. researchers in failing to grasp the impact of disease (Vellard 1956). I am grateful to Robert Crease for helping me obtain a copy of this last article.

Cieza de Leon: Cook and Cook 1998 (bio); Cieza de Leon 1959:52 ("great plague").

Elite losses to smallpox: Sarmiento de Gamboa 2000:14445; Pachacuti Yamqui Salcamayhua 1879:307 ("scabs," "millions"); Murua 196264 (vol. 1):136 ("infinite"), quoted in Crosby 2003b:53; Pizarro 1969:19697; Cobo 1979:160; Poma de Ayala 2001:114, 141, 288; Hopkins 1983:20811. For a dissenting view, see McCaa, Nimlos, and Hampe-Martinez 2004.

Evolution of smallpox: Baxby 1981; Gubser and Smith 2002.

"virgin soil": Crosby 1976.

India smallpox study: Rao 1972:37, cited in Fenn 2001:21.

"may well have been halved": Dobyns 1963:497.

Thucydides' account of epidemic: Thucydides 1934:10914.

Not in a European language: Crosby 2003b:xxii.

Royal mummies: Pizarro 1969:20204, 25154 ("the greater part," 203); Estete, M.d., untitled narrative of journey to Pachacamac, quoted in Hemming 2004:127 ("seated"); Sancho 1917:159, 170, 195, 200; Rowe 1946:308; D'Altroy 2002:9699, 14142. Sarmiento de Gamboa matter-of-factly describes Inka methods of storing bodies after death, though he only uses the word "mummy" once (Sarmiento de Gamboa 2000:12023, 13536, 14546).

Burning of Thupa Inka: Sarmiento de Gamboa 2000:121, 159; Betanzos 1996:7479; D'Altroy 2002:108.

Atawallpa execution: Rowe 1997. I thank Patricia Lyon for sending me this article.

"win the land": Pizarro 1969:199. See also, Sancho 1917:17172; Wright 1992:7275.

European failures without epidemics, factions: Restall 2003:7072 (Mexico, Florida); Hemming 1978:6984 (Brazil); White 1991: esp. Chap. 4 (France).

Additional smallpox epidemics: Hopkins 1983:21213 ("They died by scores," quoted on 213).

Typhus, flu, etc., 90 percent death toll: Dobyns 1963. Dobyns's argument was supported almost two decades later in Noble David Cook's book-length survey, which argued that six main epidemics hit Tawantinsuyu between 1524 and 1614, reducing the population by an estimated 93 percent (N. D. Cook 1981).

Smallpox in Hispaniola: The first evidence of smallpox's arrival is in a letter of 10 January 1519 by the Hieronymite Fathers, then entrusted with ruling Hispaniola. At the time, the disease had killed a third of the island's inhabitants and spread to Puerto Rico (Henige 1986:1719). Smallpox may not have been the first Caribbean epidemic. Francisco Guerra, a medical historian at the Universidad de Alcala de Henares, in Spain, makes a strong case for a swine influenza epidemic in 1493 that "was responsible for the disappearance of the American Indians in the Antilles" (Guerra 1988:305). Noble David Cook suggests the epidemic was smallpox (N. D. Cook 2003).

Smallpox hits Mexico: The evidence is examined carefully in McCaa 1995. See also, Hopkins 1983:20408 and the sources in Chap. 4.

"Debated since": Denevan ed. 1976:xvii. Denevan was far from alone in his interest. At about the same time, for instance, Wilbur Jacobs, a historian at the University of California in Santa Barbara, described the puzzle of native numbers as "truly one of the most fascinating number games in history" (Jacobs 1974:123).

Mooney: Mooney 1928; Ubelaker 1976, 1988. Mooney's article was posthumous.

Kroeber's estimates: Kroeber 1934 ("sharply localized," 25); 1939:31, 134, 166. Greenland is included in Kroeber's population density figure, lowering it somewhat.

Sauer, Cook, and Borah: Among their many works are Sauer 1935; Cook and Simpson 1948; Borah and Cook 1964; Cook and Borah 1963, 1979. See also, Denevan 1996c.

"Historians and anthropologists": Dobyns 1995.

World population in 1500: United Nations Population Division 1999:5.

"greatest destruction": Lovell 1992:426. See also, Crosby 1986:20809; Porter 1998:163; Jacobs 1974:128.

Dobyns's 1966 article, Denevan's book: Dobyns 1966; Denevan 1976.

Dobyns's ideas attacked: Author's interviews, Dobyns, Russell Thornton, Shepard Krech. See also Thornton 1987:3436; Krech 1999:8384; Henige 1998, 1990, 1978b.

Dobyns revises figures: Dobyns 1983:42. The new figure was for North America only.

Henige bio, critiques: Interview, Henige; Henige 1998 (bio, 45; "Suspect," 314); 1978b (Hispaniola); Osborne 1998.

"You always hear": Interview and email, Stiffarm. The unconscious persistence of the view that before Columbus the Americas were uninhabited, or almost so, is amazing. As late as 1986 Bernard Bailyn, past president of the American Historical Society, published a book called The Peopling of British North America: An Introduction (Bailyn 1986). The book is about British immigration. But the title also suggests that before Europeans the land was not peopled. Indeed, Indians are almost not to be found in the text.

"crater": Interview, Wilson; Wilson 1999.

4 / Frequently Asked Questions De Soto: Duncan 1995; Mena 1930:26466 (Challcochima). De Soto, Hemming observed, was "as brutal as any other conquistador. He [led] the force that raped the mamaconas [nuns, more or less] of Cajas during the march toward Cajamarca. His reputation among some modern writers of being more humane than his companions is undeserved" (Hemming 2004:555).

De Soto expedition: The numbers of men and animals differ somewhat in different accounts. I use Ramenofsky 1987:59. The basic sources are "Gentleman of Elvas" 1922 and its apparent predecessor, Fernandez de Biedma 1922. These and other documents are collected in Clayton, Knight, and Moore eds. 1993. The state of scholarly knowledge is assayed in Galloway ed. 1997. Popular accounts include Wilson 1999:13437; Morgan 1993:7275; Parkman 1983 (vol. 1):2831.

Hudson's reconstruction of route: Interview, Hudson; Hudson 1993. For a fierce debate on the reliability of these reconstructions, see Henige 1993; Hudson, DePratter, and Smith 1993; Hudson et al. 1994.

De Soto's passage over Mississippi: "Gentleman of Elvas" 1922 (vol. 1):11217 (all quotes, 113); Fernandez de Biedma 1922 (vol. 2):2528. See also Rollings 1995:3940.

La Salle expedition: Parkman 1983 (vol. 1):92030.

Contrast between De Soto and La Salle's experiences: Author's interviews, Galloway, Hudson, Ramenofsky; Ramenofsky 1987:5563; Burnett and Murray 1993:228.

Pigs as source for epidemic: Ramenofsky and Galloway 1997:27173; Crosby 1986:17276, 21213 (suggesting epidemic disease may also have come before De Soto), 273; Crosby 2003b:77 (importance of pigs to Spanish).

Indian lack of domesticated animals, lactose intolerance: Crosby 1986:19, 27; Ridley 2000:19294. Francisco Guerra notes that the Philippines did not experience epidemics from colonization, though its inhabitants were as isolated as Indians. The critical difference, he suggests, was the existence of domesticated animals, especially pigs, in the Philippines (Guerra 1988:323).

Caddo and Coosa: Perttula 1993, 1991:51214; M. T. Smith 1994:26465; M. T. Smith 1987.