History of the American Negro in the Great World War - Part 9
Library

Part 9

Captain Boyd refused to retreat, but ordered his men not to fire until they were attacked. The Mexican commander retired to the flank and almost immediately opened with machine gun fire from a concealed trench. This was quickly followed by rifle fire from the remainder of the force. The Mexicans outnumbered the troopers nearly two to one and their most effective force was intrenched. The Americans were on a flat plain, unprotected by anything larger than bunches of cactus or sage brush. They dismounted, laid flat on the ground and responded to the attack as best they could. The horses were mostly stampeded by the early firing.

The spray of lead from the machine gun had become so galling that Captain Boyd decided to charge the position. Not a man wavered in the charge. They took the gun, the Captain falling dead across the barrel of it just as the last Mexican was killed or put to flight. Lieutenant Adair was also killed. The Mexicans returned in force and recaptured the position.

Captain Morey had been concerned in warding off a flank attack. His men fought no less bravely than the others. They finally were driven to seek refuge in an adobe house, that is; all who were able to reach it. Here they kept the Mexicans at bay for hours firing through windows and holes in the walls. Captain Morey seriously wounded, with a few of his survivors, finally escaped from the house and hid for nearly two days in a hole. The soldiers refused to leave their officer. When they finally were able to leave their place of concealment, the several that were left a.s.sisted their Captain on the road towards the main force. Arriving at a point where reinforcements could be summoned, the Captain wrote a report to his commander and sent his men to headquarters with it. They arrived in record time and a party was sent out, reaching the wounded officer in time to save his life.

About half of the American force was wiped out and most of the others were taken prisoners. They inflicted a much heavier loss on the Mexicans. Among the killed was the Mexican commander who had ordered the treacherous attack.

It may be that "someone had blundered." This was not the concern of the black troopers; in the face of odds they fought by the cactus and lay dead under the Mexican stars.

In closing this outline of the Negro's partic.i.p.ation in former wars, it is highly appropriate to quote the tributes of two eminent men. One, General Benjamin F. Butler, a conspicuous military leader on the Union side in the Civil War, and Wendell Phillips, considered by many the greatest orator America ever produced, and who devoted his life to the abolition movement looking to the freedom of the slave in the United States. Said General Butler on the occasion of the debate in the National House of Representatives on the Civil Rights bill; ten years after the b.l.o.o.d.y battle of New Market Heights; speaking to the bill, and referring to the gallantry of the black soldiers on that field of strife: "It became my painful duty to follow in the track of that charging column, and there, in a s.p.a.ce not wider than the clerk's desk and three hundred yards long, lay the dead bodies of 543 of my colored comrades, fallen in defense of their country, who had offered their lives to uphold its flag and its honor, as a willing sacrifice; and as I rode along among them, guiding my horse this way and that way, lest he should profane with his hoofs what seemed to me the sacred dead, and as I looked on their bronzed faces upturned in the shining sun, as if in mute appeal against the wrongs of the country whose flag had only been to them a flag of stripes, on which no star of glory had ever shone for them-feeling I had wronged them in the past and believing what was the future of my country to them-among my dead comrades there I swore to myself a solemn oath, 'May my right hand forget its cunning and my tongue cleave to the roof of my mouth, if I ever fail to defend the rights of those men who have given their blood for me and my country this day, and for their race forever,' and, G.o.d helping me, I will keep that oath."

Mr. Phillips in his great oration on Toussaint L'Ouverture, the Black of St. Domingo; statesman, warrior and LIBERATOR,-delivered in New York City, March 11, 1863, said among other things, a constellation of linguistic brilliants not surpa.s.sed since the impa.s.sioned appeals of Cicero swept the Roman Senate to its feet, or Demosthenes fired his listeners with the flame of his matchless eloquence;

"You remember that Macaulay says, comparing Cromwell with Napoleon, that Cromwell showed the greater military genius, if we consider that he never saw an army till he was forty; while Napoleon was educated from a boy in the best military schools in Europe. Cromwell manufactured his own army; Napoleon at the age of twenty-seven was placed at the head of the best troops Europe ever saw. They were both successful; but, says Macaulay, with such disadvantages, the Englishman showed the greater genius. Whether you allow the inference or not, you will at least grant that it is a fair mode of measurement.

"Apply it to Toussaint. Cromwell never saw an army until he was forty; this man never saw a soldier till he was fifty. Cromwell manufactured his own army-out of what? Englishmen-the best blood in Europe. Out of the middle cla.s.s of Englishmen, the best blood of the island. And with it he conquered what? Englishmen-their equals. This man manufactured his army out of what? Out of what you call the despicable race of Negroes, debased, demoralized by two hundred years of slavery, 100,000 of them imported into the island within four years, unable to speak a dialect intelligible even to each other. Yet out of this mixed, and, as you say, despicable ma.s.s, he forged a thunderbolt, and hurled it at what? At the proudest blood in Europe, the Spaniard, and sent him home conquered; at the most warlike blood in Europe, the French, and put them under his feet; at the pluckiest blood in Europe, the English, and they skulked home to Jamaica."

The world is acquainted with the treacherous infamy inspired by the great Napoleon, that inveigled the Black Chieftain and liberator of his people on shipboard, the voyage to France, and his subsequent death-STARVED!-in the dungeon of the prison castle of St. Joux.

Whittier, the poet evangelist, whose inspired verse contributed much to the crystallization of the sentiment and spirit that finally doomed African slavery in America, thus referred to the heartless tragedy and the splendid Black who was its victim: "Sleep calmy in thy dungeon-tomb,

Beneath Besancon's alien sky,

Dark Haytien!-for the time shall come,

Yea, even now is nigh-

When, everywhere, thy name shall be

Redeemed from color's infamy;

And men shall learn to speak of thee,

As one of earth's great spirits, born

In servitude, and nursed in scorn,

Casting aside the weary weight

And fetters of its low estate,

In that strong majesty of soul,

Which knows no color, tongue or clime,

Which still hath spurned the base control

Of tyrants through all time!"

CHAPTER XI.

HOUR OF HIS NATION'S PERIL.

NEGRO'S PATRIOTIC ATt.i.tUDE-SELECTIVE DRAFT IN EFFECT-FEATURES AND RESULTS-BOLD RELIANCE ON FAITH IN A PEOPLE-NO COLOR LINE DRAWN-DISTRIBUTION OF REGISTRANTS BY STATES-NEGRO AND WHITE REGISTRATIONS COMPARED-NEGRO PERCENTAGES HIGHER-CLAIMED FEWER EXEMPTIONS-INDUCTIONS BY STATES-BETTER PHYSICALLY THAN WHITES-TABLES, FACTS AND FIGURES.

As stated in a previous chapter, the Negro's real opportunity to show his patriotic att.i.tude did not come until the pa.s.sage of the compulsory service law; selective draft, was the name attached to it later and by which it was generally known.

On May 18, 1917, the day the law was enacted by congress, no advocate of preparedness could with confidence have forecasted the success of it. There were many who feared the total failure of it. The history of the United States disclosed a popular adherence to the principle of voluntary enlistment, if not a repudiation of the principle of selection or compulsory military service.

It was to be expected that many people would look upon the law as highly experimental; as an act that, if it did not produce grave disorders in the country, would fall short of the results for which it was intended. It was fortunate for the country at this time, that the military establishment possessed in the person of General Crowder, one who had made a special study of selective drafts and other forms of compulsory service, not alone in this country, but throughout the nations of the world and back to the beginning of recorded history. He had become as familiar with all phases of it as though it had been a personal hobby and lifetime pursuit.

The law was extremely plain and permitted of no guessing or legal quibbling over its terms. It boldly recited the military obligations of citizenship. It vested the president with the most complete power of prescribing regulations calculated to strike a balance between the industrial, agricultural and economic needs of the nation on the one hand and the military need on the other.

Within 18 days between May 18, when the law was approved, and June 5, the day the president had fixed as registration day, a great, administrative machine was built. Practically the entire male citizenship of the United States within the age limits fixed by law, twenty-one to thirty years inclusive, presented itself at the 4,000 enrollment booths with a registered result of nearly 10,000,000 names. The project had been so systematized that within 48 hours almost complete registration returns had been a.s.sembled by telegraph in Washington.

The order in which the ten-million registrants were to be called was accomplished on July 20 by a great central lottery in Washington.

The boards proceeded promptly to call, to examine physically and to consider claims for exemption of over one and one half million men, a sufficient number to fill the first national quota of 687,000. Thus in less than three and one-half months the nation had accepted and vigorously executed a compulsory service law.

On June 5, 1918, 753,834 men were added to the rolls. On August 24, 1918, that number was increased by 159,161; finally on September 12, 1918, under the provision of the act of August 31,1918, 13,228,762 were added to the lists of those available for military service, which, including interim and other accessions, amounted to a grand total of 24,234,021 enrolled and subject to the terms of the Selective Service law. This tremendous exhibition of man power struck terror to the heart of the Hun and hastened him to, if possible, deliver a telling blow against the Allies before the wonderful strength and resources of the American nation could be brought to bear against him.

Commenting on the facility with which the selective draft was put into effect, the report of the Provost Marshall General stated in part: "The expedition and smoothness with which the law was executed emphasized the remarkable flexibility, adaptability and efficiency of our system of government and the devotion of our people. Here was a gigantic project in which success was staked not on reliance in the efficiency of a man, or an hierarchy of men, or, primarily, on a system. Here was a bold reliance on faith in a people. Most exacting duties were laid with perfect confidence on the officials of every locality in the nation, from the governors of states to the registrars of elections, and upon private citizens of every condition, from men foremost in the industrial and political life of the nation to those who had never before been called upon to partic.i.p.ate in the functions of government. By all administrative tokens, the accomplishment of their task was magic."

No distinction regarding color or race was made in the selective draft law, except so far as non-citizen Indians were exempt from the draft. But the organization of the army placed Negro soldiers in separate units; and the several calls for mobilization, were, therefore, affected by this circ.u.mstance, in that no calls could be issued for Negro registrants until the organizations were ready for them. Figures of total registration given previously in this chapter include interim accessions and some that automatically went on the rolls after September 12, 1918. Inasmuch as the tables prepared by the Provost Marshall General's department deal only with those placed on the rolls on regular registration days and do not include the accessions mentioned, comparisons which follow will be based on those tables. They show the total registration as 23,779,997, of which 21,489,470 were white and 2,290,527 were black. Following is a table showing the distribution of colored and white registrants by states:

Colored Total registrants Colored June 5, 1917 Colored Total and white Colored registrants colored registrants. to Sept 11, Sept 12, registrants.

1918. 1918.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------- United States 23,779,097 1,078,331 1,212,196 2,290,527 ===================================================== Alabama 444,692 81,963 81,410 163,373 Arizona 93,078 295 680 975 Arkansas 365,754 51,176 53,659 104,835 California 787,676 3,308 6,404 9,712 Colorado 215,178 1,103 1,867 2,970 Connecticut 373,676 3,524 4,659 8,183 Delaware 55,215 3,798 4,448 8,246 District of Columbia 89,808 11,045 15,433 26,478 Florida 208,931 39,013 43,019 82,032 Georgia 549,020 112,593 108,183 220,781 Idaho 103,740 254 255 509 Illinois 1,571,717 21,816 35,597 57,413 Indiana 639,431 11,289 16,549 27,838 Iowa 523,957 2,959 3,022 5,981 Kansas 381,315 5,575 7,448 13,023 Kentucky 486,599 25,850 30,182 56,032 Louisiana 391,654 76,223 82,256 158,479 Maine 159,350 163 179 342 Maryland 313,255 26,435 32,736 59,171 Ma.s.sachusetts 884,030 6,044 8,056 14,100 Michigan 871,410 6,979 8,950 15,929 Minnesota 540,003 1,541 1,809 3,350 Mississippi 344,506 81,548 91,534 173,082 Missouri 764,428 22,796 31,524 54,320 Montana 196,999 320 494 814 Nebraska 286,147 1,614 2,417 4,031 Nevada 29,465 69 112 172 New Hampshire 95,035 77 98 175 New Jersey 761,238 14,056 19,340 33,396 New Mexico 80,158 235 350 595 New York 2,503,290 25,974 35,299 61,273 North Carolina 480,901 73,357 69,168 142,525 North Dakota 159,391 65 165 230 Ohio 1,387,830 28,831 35,156 63,987 Oklahoma 423,864 14,305 23,253 37,563 Oregon 176,010 144 534 678 Pennsylvania 2,067,023 39,363 51,111 90,474 Rhode Island 134,232 1,573 1,913 3,486 South Carolina 307,229 74,265 74,912 149,177 South Dakota 142,783 144 171 315 Tennessee 474,253 43,735 51,059 94,794 Texas 989,571 83,671 82,775 166,446 Utah 100,038 169 392 561 Vermont 71,464 63 89 152 Virginia 464,903 64,358 75,816 140,174 Washington 319,337 373 1,353 1,726 West Virginia 324,975 13,292 14,652 27,944 Wisconsin 584,639 718 1,117 1,835 Wyoming 58,700 280 570 850

White registrants White Total Percent of June 5, 1917 registrants white Percent total to Sept 11 Sept 12, registrants. of total registrants. 1918. 1918. registrants.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- United States 9.83 9,562,515 11,926,955 21,480,470 90.37 =================================================================== Alabama 36.74 124,247 157,072 281,319 63.26 Arizona 1.05 39,884 52,219 92,103 98.95 Arkansas 28.66 117,111 143,808 260,919 71.34 California 1.23 312,994 464,970 777,964 98.77 Colorado 1.38 90,453 121,755 212,208 98.62 Connecticut . 2.19 171,296 194,197 365,493 97.81 Delaware 14.93 20,761 26,208 46,969 85.07 District of Columbia 29.45 25,625 37,795 63,420 70.56 Florida 39.26 55,572 71,327 126,899 60.74 Georgia 40.22 147,604 180,635 328,239 59.78 Idaho 0.49 45,224 58,007 103,231 99.51 Illinois 3.65 685,254 829,050 1,514,304 96.35 Indiana 4.35 272,442 339,151 611,593 95.65 Iowa 1.14 237,744 280,232 517,976 98.86 Kansas 3.41 161,691 206,602 368,293 96.59 Kentucky 11.52 190,060 240,507 430,567 88.43 Louisiana 40.46 103,718 129,467 233,185 59.54 Maine 0.22 67,941 91,067 159,008 99.73 Maryland 18.89 110,066 144,018 254,084 81.11 Ma.s.sachusetts 1.60 391,654 478,276 869,930 93.40 Michigan 1.83 404,040 451,441 855,481 98.17 Minnesota 0.62 247,750 288,903 538,653 99.38 Mississippi 50.24 75,977 95,447 171,424 49.76 Missouri 7.11 372,106 398,002 710,108 92.89 Montana 0.41 96,753 101,432 198,185 99.59 Nebraska 1.42 130,493 151,623 282,116 98.58 Nevada 0.58 12,581 16,712 29,293 99.42 New Hampshire 0.18 41,617 53,243 94,860 99.82 New Jersey 4.39 18,615 409,225 727,840 95.61 New Mexico 0.74 36,776 42,787 79,563 99.26 New York 2.44 1,092,061 1,349,956 2,442,617 97.56 North Carolina 29.63 155,102 183,274 338,376 70.37 North Dakota 0.15 72,837 85,324 159,161 98.85 Ohio 4.61 588,170 735,673 1,323,843 95.39 Oklahoma 8.86 173,851 212,450 386,301 91.15 Oregon 0.38 69,376 105,956 175,332 99.62 Pennsylvania 4.38 353,106 1,113,443 1,976,549 95.62 Rhode Island 2.59 57,433 73,313 130,746 12 South Carolina 48.56 70,395 87,657 158,052 51.44 South Dakota 0.23 64,896 77,572 142,468 99.77 Tennessee 19.99 169,674 209,785 379,459 80.01 Texas 16.82 376,385 446,740 823,125 83.18 Utah 0.56 45,930 53,547 99,477 99.44 Vermont 0.21 30,819 40,493 71,312 99.79 Virginia 30.15 141,714 183,015 324,727 69.85 Washington 0.54 123,752 193,859 317,611 99.46 West Virginia 8.60 128,852 168,179 297,031 91.40 Wisconsin 0.31 265,501 317,303 582,804 99.69 Wyoming 1.45 24,612 33,238 57,850 98.56 Results of the cla.s.sification of December 15, 1917 to September 11, 1918, in respect to colored and white registrants are shown in the following table: Colored and white cla.s.sification compared. Number. Percent Percent of total of cla.s.sified. cla.s.sified.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total colored and white registered: June 5, 1917, to Sept. 11, 1918 10,640,846 100.00 ----- Total colored registered 1,078,331 10.13 100.00 Cla.s.s I 556,917 ----- 51.65 Deferred cla.s.ses 521,414 ----- ----- Total white registered 9,562,515 89.87 100.00 Cla.s.s I 3,110,659 ----- 32.53 Deferred cla.s.ses 6,451,856 ----- ----- Percentage accepted for service on calls before Dec. 15, 1917 (report for 1917).

Colored ----- ----- 36.23 White ----- ----- 24.75 It will be seen that a much higher percentage of Negroes were accepted for service than of white men. It is true that enlistments which were permitted white men but denied Negroes, depleted the whites eligible to Cla.s.s 1 to some extent. Probably there were more Negro delinquents in proportion to their numbers in the south than white delinquents. The conditions under which they lived would account for that. Delinquents, under the regulations, were placed in Cla.s.s 1. Then there is the undoubted fact that the Negro sought and was granted fewer exemptions on the ground of dependency. Many Negroes in the south, where the rate of pay was low, were put in Cla.s.s 1 on the ground that their allotment and allowances while in the army, would furnish an equivalent support to their dependents. But whatever the reason, the great fact stands out that a much greater percentage of colored were accepted for service than white men. The following table gives the colored and white inductions by states: Total colored Colored Colored Per and white registrants, Percentage inducted Percent of registrants, June 5, of colored June 5, colored June 5, 1917, 1917, to and white 1917, to registrants.

to Sept. 11, Sept. 11, registrants. Nov. 11, 1918. 1918. 1918.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- United States 10,640,846 1,078,331 10.13 367,710 34.10 =================================================================== Alabama 206,210 81,963 39.75 25,874 31.57 Arizona 40,179 295 .73 77 26.10 Arkansas 168,287 51,176 30.4l 17,544 34.28 California 316,302 3,308 1.05 919 27.78 Colorado 91,556 1,103 1.20 317 28.74 Connecticut 174,820 3,524 2.02 941 26.70 Delaware 24,559 3,798 15.46 1,365 35.93 District of Columbia 36,670 11,045 30.12 4,000 36.22 Florida 94,585 39,013 41.25 12,904 33.08 Georgia 260,197 112,593 43.27 34,303 30.47 Idaho 45,478 254 .56 95 37.40 Illinois 707,070 21,816 3.09 8,754 40.13 Indiana 283,731 11,289 3.98 4,579 40.56 Iowa 240,703 2,959 1.23 929 31.40 Kansas 167,266 5,575 3.33 2,127 38.15 Kentucky 215,910 25,850 11.98 11,320 43.79 Louisiana 179,941 76,223 42.36 28,711 37.67 Maine 68,104 163 .24 50 30.67 Maryland 136,501 26,435 19.37 9,212 34.85 Ma.s.sachusetts 397,698 6,044 1.52 1,200 19.85 Michigan 411,019 6,979 1.70 2,395 34.32 Minnesota 249,291 1,541 .62 511 53.16 Mississippi 157,525 81,548 51.77 24,066 29.51 Missouri 334,902 22,796 6.81 9,219 40.44 Montana 97,073 320 .33 198 61.87 Nebraska 132,107 1,614 1.22 642 39.78 Nevada 12,640 59 .47 26 44.07 New Hampshire 41,694 77 .18 27 35.07 New Jersey 332,671 14,056 4.23 4,863 34.60 New Mexico 37,011 235 .63 51 21.70 New York 1,118,035 25,974 2.32 6,193 23.84 North Carolina 228,459 73,357 32.11 20,082 27.38 North Dakota 72,902 65 .09 87 ----- Ohio 617,001 28,831 4.67 7,861 27.27 Oklahoma 188,156 14,305 7.60 5,694 39.80 Oregon 69,520 144 .21 68 47.22 Pennsylvania 902,469 39,363 4.36 15,392 39.10 Rhode Island 59,006 1,573 2.67 291 18.50 South Carolina 144,660 74,265 51.34 25,798 34.74 South Dakota 65,040 144 .22 62 43.06 Tennessee 213,409 43,735 20.59 17,774 40.64 Texas 460,056 83,671 18.19 31,506 37.65 Utah 46,099 169 .37 77 45.56 Vermont 30,882 63 .20 22 34.92 Virginia 206,072 64,358 31.23 23,541 36.57 Washington 124,125 373 .30 173 46.38 West Virginia 142,144 13,292 9.35 5,492 41.32 Wisconsin 266,219 718 .27 224 31.20 Wyoming 24,892 280 1.12 95 23.93 Alaska 5 Hawaii Porto Rico

White Percent of White registrants, colored inductions, Percent June 5, and June 5, of white 1917, to white 1917, to registrants.

Sept. 11, registrants. Nov. 11, 1918. 1918.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------- United States 9,562,515 89.87 2,299,157 24.04 ===================================================== Alabama 124,247 60.25 33,881 27.27 Arizona 39,884 99.27 8,036 20.15 Arkansas 117,111 69.59 31,768 27.13 California 312,994 98.95 60,148 21.13 Colorado 90,453 98.80 22,487 24.86 Connecticut 171,296 97.98 31,598 18.45 Delaware 20,761 84.54 3,628 17.48 District of Columbia 25,625 69.88 5,631 21.97 Florida 55,572 58.75 12,012 21.62 Georgia 147,604 56.73 32,538 32.04 Idaho 45,224 99.44 12,471 27.58 Illinois 685,254 96.91 68,729 24.62 Indiana 272,442 96.02 65,170 23.92 Iowa 237,744 98.77 65,935 27.73 Kansas 161,691 96.67 39,778 21.60 Kentucky 190,060 88.02 47,010 24.60 Louisiana 103,718 57.64 27,494 26.51 Maine 67,941 99.76 15,216 22.40 Maryland 110,066 80.63 24,655 22.40 Ma.s.sachusetts 391,654 98.48 75,367 19.24 Michigan 404,040 98.30 94,085 23.29 Minnesota 247,750 99.38 73,169 29.53 Mississippi 75,977 48.23 19,296 25.40 Missouri 312,106 93.19 83,624 26.79 Montana 96,753 99.67 27,142 28.O5 Nebraska 130,493 98.78 29,165 22.35 Nevada 12,581 99.53 8,138 24.94 New Hampshire 41,617 99.82 8,377 20.13 New Jersey 318,615 95.77 66,527 20.88 New Mexico 36,776 99.37 8,811 23.96 New York 1,092,061 97.68 247,396 22.65 North Carolina 155,102 67.89 38,359 24.73 North Dakota 72,837 99.91 18,508 25.41 Ohio 568,170 95.83 130,287 22.15 Oklahoma 173,851 92.40 59,247 34.08 Oregon 69,376 99.79 16,090 23.19 Pennsylvania 863,106 95.64 185,819 21.53 Rhode Island 57,433 97.33 10,885 18.95 South Carolina 70,395 48.66 18,261 25.94 South Dakota 64,896 99.78 21,193 32.66 Tennessee 169,674 79.51 42,104 24.81 Texas 376,385 81.81 85,889 22.82 Utah 45,93O 99.63 10,711 23.32 Vermont 30,819 99.80 6,607 21.44 Virginia 141,714 68.77 34,796 24.55 Washington 123,752 99.70 28,513 23.04 West Virginia 128,852 90.65 39,863 30.94 Wisconsin 265,501 99.73 70,758 26.65 Wyoming 24,612 98.88 7,828 31.81 Alaska 1,957 Hawaii 5,406 Porto Rico 15,734 Further light on the question of more Negroes in proportion to their numbers being selected for service than white men, is found in a comparison of the Negroes and whites rejected for physical reasons. The following table gives the figures for the period between December 15, 1917 and September 11, 1918: Colored and white physical rejections compared. Number. Percent of Percent of examined partial disqualifications.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total, colored and white examined Dec. 15, 1917, to Sept. 11, 1918 3,208,446 100.00 ----- Group A 2,259,027 70.41 ----- Disqualified partly or totally 949,419 ----- 100.00 Group B 88,436 2.76 9.31 Group C 339,377 10.58 35.75 Group D 521,606 16.25 54.94 Total, colored examined 458,838 100.00 ----- Group A 342,277 74.60 ----- Disqualified partly or totally 116,561 ----- 100.00 Group B 9,605 2.09 8.24 Group C 27,474 5.99 23.57 Group D 79,482 17.32 68.19 Total white examined 2,749,608 100.00 ----- Group A 1,916,750 69.71 ----- Disqualified partly or totally 832,858 ----- 100.00 Group B 78,831 2.87 9.47 Group C 311,903 11.34 37.45 Group D 442,124 16.08 53.08

The percentage of Negroes unqualifiedly accepted for service, was 74.60% of the number examined; the white men accepted numbered 69.71% of the number examined. The Negroes it will be seen rated about 5% higher physically than the whites. No better refutation could be desired of the charge, having its inspiration in the vanquished, but unrepentant defenders of Negro slavery, mourning about its dead carca.s.s, that the Negro is deteriorating physically, or that the so-called degenerative influences of civilization affect him in greater degree than they do the white man.

CHAPTER XII.

NEGRO SLACKERS AND PACIFISTS UNKNOWN.